The simple truth

[Rampant.A.I.]

Then you'd be right, but be careful not to throw the baby out with the bath water.

Perhaps you could define for us as laypersons, what does not constitute science.

---

What?


Is so!

Well, for example, evolutionists sometimes make the claim that evolution has been proved beyond any doubt. I'm talking about the sort of evolution where rocks become humans. So I don't consider that kind of evolution to be scientific fact. Also when someone makes the claim that there definitely is no God, and then gives "scientific proof" of this. Yet there is no science that can prove the non existence of God. As He exists apart from science; He is supernatural:

"As you do not know what is the way of the wind,
Or how the bones grow in the womb of her who is with child,
So you do not know the works of God who makes everything." (Ecc 11:5)

See, that's what I mean by throwing the baby out with the bath water. Evolution makes no claims about the origin of life. Evolution is the adaptation of existing forms of life, over time.

You're rejecting accepted scientific theory (like Gravity) based on someone else's ignorant announcements from a pulpit.

Here's a google definition:

"ev·o·lu·tion
the process by which different kinds of living organisms are thought to have developed and diversified from earlier forms during the history of the earth.
synonyms: Darwinism, natural selection"

Here's further information:

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary...faq.php#a1

Scientific proof of God's existence or non-existence is impossible by definition. Science makes no claims about the divine, individuals with beliefs do.

You might as well type "I don't believe in Computer Science. It's just a theory, so I don't consider it to be a scientific fact" on a forum from your Smart Phone.