(April 14, 2010 at 9:38 am)Jon Paul Wrote: Someone who has no convictions is more biogted than someone who has because he who has none can always change his mind at any time to win an argument whereas a person with convictions has to keep some integrity because he has to defend that stable conviction, so he cannot be bigoted to the same extent
But if you have no convictions then you can honestly look to the evidence rather than blindly sticking to your "convictions" despite all evidence to the contrary, surely?
EvF