(May 9, 2014 at 8:37 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/09...98379.html
Quote:"This is an unconstitutional attempt to narrow the definition of equality," [Pulaski County Circuit Judge Chris] Piazza wrote. "The exclusion of a minority for no rational reason is a dangerous precedent."
You're god damn right it is.
Roll on, fabulanche.
The rationale reason would be that heterosexual unions generally offer more value to society then homosexual unions. A simple thought experiment is all that is needed to prove the point. Imagine if everyone in a society became homosexual. Such an event would be catastrophic on society. Now imagine if everyone in society became heterosexual. Society wouldn't miss a beat.
Since heterosexual unions generally provide more value to society, the state has reasons to incent such unions over less valuable ones.