(May 10, 2014 at 2:45 am)Heywood Wrote: You need to learn how to comprehend the written language. I never said I had a problem with the wording of the ruling. I never even said I had a problem with the result of the ruling. I said I have a problem with judges making rulings under false pretenses. The judge claimed their was no rational reason to exclude the minority....which I showed in my first post in this thread to be false.
Maybe I am being anal here, but I like people...especially judges to make good arguments. Your willingness to ignore bad arguments is probably why your so bad at critical thinking and argumentation.
And here we are again: you say we're willing to ignore bad arguments, when what you've presented as "rational" argumentation against gay marriage relies on special pleading with regards to the purpose of marriage, and frankly misses the point of marriage in this day and age.
You just can't step out of your own head for one goddamn second, even if it's just to consider the possibility that some of us don't find your arguments compelling.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!