(May 11, 2014 at 4:32 pm)kılıç_mehmet Wrote: I really have no time to explain my position on this "marriage equality" bullcrap.
I merely have stated that this "marriage" that they are proposing is not even marriage.
Fine, then. Don't worry about it. If marriage equality came to your country, it wouldn't actually have any effect on you anyway.
Quote:Its merely another ploy of the liberal, rootless cosmopolitan mindset to redefine social institutions and traditions. Lets re-define everything to suit the purposes of minorities.
Sounds to me like the dictatorship of minorities such as the homosexuals over the majority of normal people.
Yeah, it's so terrible to, uh, do what? Demand the recognition of equal rights that our country's Constitution guarantees? That's an important point in this debate in America, the point everybody on the wrong side of this debate seems to ignore: this sort of discrimination has been illegal since the passage of the 14th amendment 150 years ago. These state-level bans were never legal to begin with. If you want to legally deny millions of people their equal rights, you have to put a Constitutional amendment to vote, to overturn the 14th amendment. Then, you can legally put state-level bans to a vote.
Good luck.
It doesn't really matter, anyway. By the end of this decade, only the most deeply-inbred states won't have majority support for it anyway. For all this panty-shitting going on about activist judges, they are only accelerating the inevitable by a handful of years.
