(May 31, 2014 at 9:48 am)alpha male Wrote: As I didn't claim that DNA is required for determination of personhood, no, your point is not terribly important.
Who said you made that claim? You claimed that individual DNA was an indicator of personhood. I demonstrated that it isn't. You then fabricate this required condition to your own argument in an attempt to make my contribution irrelevant.
This is the adult version of taking your ball and going home.
