(June 18, 2014 at 12:15 am)Pickup_shonuff Wrote:
Wrong again. And stupid. If his version was drastically different than the manuscripts from the 3rd and 4th centuries, that still wouldn't effect modern versions. Why not? BECAUSE WE HAVE THE 3RD AND 4TH CENTURY MANUSCRIPTS. This is not a defense of the Bible. It is a defense of using your brain and common sense.
The Pope approves of your spirited defense. It's too bad that you don't seem to know that the English wrote the Latin Vulgate as a gift to the Pope. So even if Wycliffe used the Vulgate as source material the Bible was just a fabrication by the English.