(August 31, 2014 at 2:12 pm)Blackout Wrote: As a law student I don't think philosophy should have a higher place when it comes to jurisprudence - We need good solutions and justice/security - Philosophy only serves the purpose of determining What is justice? What is the law? Why do laws exist and answering other ambiguous questions - But other than that objectivity and precision are far more important.
Jurisprudence is the philosophy of law.
Have you not heard of H.L.A Hart or Ronald Dworkin? There is much work on this very topic already.
Anytime you practice law you are practicing a jurisprudence or philosophy of law.
Ut supra, ita inferius
![[Image: 0c112e9da4d42c24a073c335a3e38de1_zpsezmp...g~original]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i1297.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fag22%2FComrade_Mei-Ling%2F0c112e9da4d42c24a073c335a3e38de1_zpsezmp8izf.jpg~original)
Uƚ ƨuqɿɒ, iƚɒ inʇɘɿiuƨ