Zidneya, unfortunately I don't have time to spend meticulously responding to the dozens of points you've made.
I started to read you last post and realise where we differ... it seems that we both spot the IS genocide, but I think where we differ is on the appropriateness or the subtlety of the word genocide. For example, Wikipedia says this:
"Genocide is the systematic destruction of all or a significant part of a racial, ethnic, religious or national group via the (a) Killing of members of the group; (b) Causing of serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; © Deliberate inflicting on the group's conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing of measures intended to prevent births within the group; or (e) Forcible transferring of children of the group to another group."
And in the sense of the word you are right to say that the US and the UN are committing genocide on IS.
But lets look at why both sides are committing genocide.
IS are extreme muslims who want to enforce the caliphate, and create the true islam (in their eyes) in the land that they can take in the religious jihad. And the genocide is whatever it needs to be in order to get the sharia in place.
Whereas, the UN (hopefully) will commit genocide (of the religious sort) and destroy the barbaric, parasitic, evil scum that call themselves IS, so that all humans on this planet realise that we have a basis for human rights and liberty, and they will transcend all religions and politics.
I started to read you last post and realise where we differ... it seems that we both spot the IS genocide, but I think where we differ is on the appropriateness or the subtlety of the word genocide. For example, Wikipedia says this:
"Genocide is the systematic destruction of all or a significant part of a racial, ethnic, religious or national group via the (a) Killing of members of the group; (b) Causing of serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; © Deliberate inflicting on the group's conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing of measures intended to prevent births within the group; or (e) Forcible transferring of children of the group to another group."
And in the sense of the word you are right to say that the US and the UN are committing genocide on IS.
But lets look at why both sides are committing genocide.
IS are extreme muslims who want to enforce the caliphate, and create the true islam (in their eyes) in the land that they can take in the religious jihad. And the genocide is whatever it needs to be in order to get the sharia in place.
Whereas, the UN (hopefully) will commit genocide (of the religious sort) and destroy the barbaric, parasitic, evil scum that call themselves IS, so that all humans on this planet realise that we have a basis for human rights and liberty, and they will transcend all religions and politics.
