In need of a more humbleness. Why condemning the Theistic position makes no sense.

[The Grand Nudger]

Well if you look at the verse in my signature,

---

it shows all good people will enter paradise. Those who do good will enter paradise. There were a lot of scholars even in the early days of Islam that said disbelievers meant in context of socio-political group, particularly those who were fighting Mohammad and the believers at that time in Arabia. It didn't refer to everyone who didn't believe or would not believe in the future.

The Shia hadiths in detail say that anyone who doesn't know the truth and doesn't oppose it, would not be judged as a "disbeliever" that is condemned in Quran.

It's one of those debatable things but I think if you take account verses like the one in my signature, as well as verses that talk about the nature of humanity being the true religion of God, I think you come to realize the Quran perhaps didn't come with this dogmatic view that we see many scholars did come up with.

---

As Islam was manufactured by men over a stretch of indeterminate time - of course- there will have been a point at which it's dogma had not been codified or set in stone. If I have to take two verses that say entirely disparate things and decide which one is the party line, or if I have to imagine that what is meant by the words on the page as something-other than- what words are on the page - the proposition is DOA. Don;t get me wrong, I like your interpretation - but something (maybe the constant invocations of hellfire and pain for the unbelievers repeated ad naus throughout the entirety of the text) tells me that it's a minority report - at best. Your verse doesn't seem, to me, to make the claim that -you- make about it. "Those that do good" would not include the unbelievers. You know as well as I that Islam (like all religions) has special definitions and categories for this sort of thing.