Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"

[rexbeccarox]

Erm What? Do you have an argument why this is justified? And what do you mean by a decision being made through an act?

Yes, I was referring to the Emmanuel Kant's observations concerning acts. I am doubting that someone could be born gay. When the argument is cleared it all comes down to the act. Both sides could argue if a person is born gay or not. However, it really comes down to the act to be considered to be gay or not. Remember, I mentioned the legal considerations also which actually looks at the physical act which is the final determination.

So, what is one's sexual orientation before "the act"?