Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"

[FatAndFaithless]

I am doubting that someone could be born heterosexual. When the argument is cleared it all comes down to the act. Both sides could argue if a person is born straight or not. However, it really comes down to the act to be considered to be straight or not.


See how dumb that sounds when you consider the reasoning applied to your own (i assume) sexuality?

Let me explain this, as simple as possible:

1. You were born either female or male.
2. Either genetics or social environment forms your sexual orientation(debatable).
3. There should not be any legislation which would punish someone who is gay!

Ah, gotcha. Well, #3 on that list is the most important to me, but #2 would be interesting. Sorry if I jumped down your throat, I assumed you were going to go to the canard of "being gay is a choice", and therefore doesn't deserve to be on equal footing as 'natural' heterosexuality. But if you're just asking about the genetic/environmental factors that may or may not determine sexuality, then yeah, very interesting topic!