RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 15, 2014 at 12:50 pm
(October 15, 2014 at 12:46 pm)Crossless1 Wrote:(October 15, 2014 at 12:38 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: First of all Matthew did meet Jesus he was one of his apostles.
What I was saying about my quote was that there are pretty clear standards of what a marriage is, between man and woman, if you don't see this you haven't read my quote.
Finally the quote Jesus said was actually a quote from the old testament Genesis 22-24" For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh."
Newsflash, C4RM5: Most of us here don't really give a flying fuck what Jesus' opinion was on marriage.
As for Jesus' alleged disciple, Matthew, actually being the author of the Gospel traditionally attributed to him, please see the meaning of the phrase 'traditionally attributed'. He wrote that Gospel the same way "Moses" wrote the Torah -- i.e., he didn't, though a lot of simpletons like you haven't caught up with the past 200+ years of Biblical scholarship. Time to join the 21st Century, son.
And please answer Esquilax's question. What are believers to do with gays according to your holy book (and why do you lack such faith that you don't follow your god's command)?
Can I say FatandFaithless didn't say Matthew didn't write the Gospel book, he said Matthew didn't meet Jesus.
