Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"

[Esquilax]

I don't understand the poll. I didn't vote.

Queers have a right to be queer. Being queer goes against nature, it is not healthy and normal behavior for the most part. I don't believe in homosexual marriage. But I think committed homosexuals should be given the right that married couples get.

That is my opinion on queers.

It's also a factually incorrect opinion: plenty of animals have been observed exhibiting homosexual behaviors, so the claim that it's "against nature," is literally wrong. As for "normal" behavior, I would suggest that when something is a persistent, lifelong trait that has existed for almost- if not entirely- all of human culture and transcends species boundaries, that it's about as normal as anything else we do. Certainly more normal than, say, pumpkin spice, which I assume you have no moral objection to?

Given your cavalierly homophobic language and the easy way in which you spout obviously incorrect assertions as fact, I don't know whether being corrected is even possible for you, but... we'll see. The facts don't fit your opinion; I wonder which you'll attempt to change?