Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 2, 2025, 5:55 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Bible, what's literal and what's not?
#1
The Bible, what's literal and what's not?
So many times, I hear of Christian or Catholics stating something "truthful" of the bible, as in that certain part is read literally as in they are right. Take these quotes from the bible for an example:
-"For truly, I say to you, if you have faith as a grain of mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, 'Move from here to there,' and it will move; and nothing will be impossible to you" Matthew 17:20
-"Philip said to him, "Lord, show us the Father, and we shall be satisfied." Don't you know me, Philip? He who has seen me has seen the Father." John 14:8.

There are more, and as you notice, those things are positive and nice. But whenever I quote something negatively or with a negative connotation, they say things like "That part is not literal" or "You aren't reading it right." Like these for example:
-"No one can serve two masters; for either he will hate the one and love the other, or else he will be loyal to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve God and Money." Matthew 6:24
-"If your hand or your foot causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life maimed or crippled than to have two hands or two feet and be thrown into eternal fire. And if your eye causes you to sin, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to enter life with one eye than to have two eyes and be thrown into the fire of hell." Matthew 18:8-9

And there are more than that, but I don't want to look for them all night. But it's true. Those who praise the bible say that certain things are literal and certain things are not, but if you notice, most if not all of the "literal" verses of the bible are with positive connotation and they'll say things like "yes. What it says is clearly literal" or "of course it's literal. What else could it mean?" Yet if you ask a christian about something like Matthew 18:8-9, they will quickly say that "O, it's a metaphor." Or "That's not literal." Are the positive things the only truthful things or something? It's like they are trying to keep the bible as perfect as they can. What do you all think about this?
Reply



Messages In This Thread
The Bible, what's literal and what's not? - by superstarr - July 3, 2010 at 12:42 am

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Jerry Falwell Jnr "not a christian" and wanted to prove himself to not be like Snr Pat Mustard 18 3363 November 1, 2022 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: Silver
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 55671 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Wanted: Christians who reject the supernatural and a literal afterlife. Whateverist 48 15983 October 20, 2017 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  How does "Science prove that the miracles of the Bible did not happen" ? Emzap 62 15336 November 4, 2016 at 2:05 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Mary is not a virgin by the Bible accounts Fake Messiah 26 5197 September 30, 2016 at 6:11 pm
Last Post: brewer
  What the Bible Does NOT Say About Premarital Sex Rhondazvous 30 8034 January 25, 2016 at 2:40 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Illinois bible colleges: "We shouldn't have to follow state standards because bible!" Esquilax 34 9256 January 23, 2015 at 12:29 pm
Last Post: Spooky
  Trust the Bible not Science Dolorian 34 9648 October 25, 2014 at 10:09 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  The Bible: not a page turner! sven 34 7330 April 7, 2014 at 7:26 am
Last Post: truthBtold
  The Bible is the claim, not the evidence Bad Writer 299 103828 February 27, 2014 at 11:02 am
Last Post: Esquilax



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)