Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: August 21, 2026, 6:13 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Bible, what's literal and what's not?
#68
RE: The Bible, what's literal and what's not?
(July 7, 2010 at 12:37 am)tavarish Wrote: [quote='Godschild' pid='78612' dateline='1278442202']

Nope structural engineers have stated that we (modern man) do not have the ability,even with all our technology, to lay out the base of the pyrimids as accurately as the Egyptians did.

travis Wrote:1. Please provde citation for claims dealing with assertions of structural engineers.
2. You're absolutely fucking insane if you think that modern man doesn't have the ability to effectively put a bunch of big rocks in a pile in such a way that is consistent. The reason we don't rebuild pyramids is because there's no need for such structures. We tend to construct buildings that are efficient, both in manpower and materials, not huge stone monuments set aside for the burials of Gods among men.

Check these out for some concise rebuttals to your catasrophe of an argument:

http://www.anomalist.com/afiles/pyramids.html

http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=74717

Not only could we do it, we could do a far better job than those living thousands of years ago.

I have yet to see any structure made in the Stone or Bronze Age that rivals the intricacy, precision, or attention to detail of any major structure built today.

I'm not going through all my books and research to find that statement if you don't accept my word about it then, if you are interested, you'll need to do your own research. I did not say that we need to rebuild the pyramids all I stated is that we can not build them with the accuracy that the Eygptians obtained. I've been in the building trades for many years and I still have not seen a house built that was truely square and I've been associated with some very creditable builders. I've yet to see stone work by modern man that's so precise that you can not slip a piece of paper between the stones even after a thousand years. All those beautiful buildings you posted will not be standing in 3000 years.
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: The Bible, what's literal and what's not? - by Godschild - July 7, 2010 at 4:05 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Jerry Falwell Jnr "not a christian" and wanted to prove himself to not be like Snr Pat Mustard 18 5572 November 1, 2022 at 8:57 pm
Last Post: Paraselene
  Without citing the bible, what marks the bible as the one book with God's message? Whateverist 143 72062 March 31, 2022 at 7:05 am
Last Post: Gwaithmir
  Evangelicals, Trump and a Quick Bible Study DeistPaladin 52 15102 November 9, 2020 at 3:20 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  How can a Christian reject part of the Bible and still call themselves a Christian? KUSA 371 165319 May 3, 2020 at 1:04 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Bible Study: The God who Lies and Deceives Rhondazvous 50 15921 May 24, 2019 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  What I see in the Bible is different then Jews and Christians. Mystic 8 4112 December 31, 2017 at 7:17 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Wanted: Christians who reject the supernatural and a literal afterlife. Whateverist 48 21318 October 20, 2017 at 10:54 am
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Difference between the Bible and the Torah; or between Christians and Jews WinterHold 2 1496 September 29, 2017 at 5:41 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  How does "Science prove that the miracles of the Bible did not happen" ? Emzap 62 22153 November 4, 2016 at 2:05 am
Last Post: dyresand
  Mary is not a virgin by the Bible accounts Fake Messiah 26 7383 September 30, 2016 at 6:11 pm
Last Post: brewer



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)