RE: The Bible, what's literal and what's not?
July 8, 2010 at 10:02 pm
(This post was last modified: July 8, 2010 at 10:09 pm by superstarr.)
(July 8, 2010 at 9:15 pm)Shell B Wrote: Sorry, but I'm not going to take an article where the author writes Ciaro, instead of Cairo, seriously. It's not that hard to run a spellcheck.
Search it for yourself then. I guess I picked a bad sourse, but this is a better possibility than that of Egyptians just suddenly knowing things that won't be discovered until 4000 years into the future. This guy from the website make not sound too reliable in that standpoint of spelling Cairo wrong, but if you take your time to search other websites, read books and watch some documentaries, you'll see that it's a much more likely possibility than that of gaining knowledge from nowhere.
(July 8, 2010 at 9:40 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Good. Glad to hear that.
Starr, I do have some problems with the whole scenario laid out by the Egyptology Club. Here's a link to a post I made at Archaeologica about 4 years ago.
http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewto...000+#p7186
P.S. - I'm still waiting for that experiment!
I was trying to get evidence on HOW they were made, not how long it took. Of course making it in 20 years is just crazy. We just don't know about that.
