Becoming an angry atheist

[Thumpalumpacus]

Hey, Chad, I think you missed this. Care to opine?

It helps my case. When someone asserts that causation’s regularity is a brute fact, he or she is violating the anthropic principle, by looking at contingent facts and calling them necessary ones.

Besides, no fine tuning argument has been presented, so the point is mute.

I think you mean "moot", firstly.

Secondly, as FNM points out above, you are assuming that there is intelligence behind natural order because what order we see created here on Earth is the product of human intelligence ... hence, anthropic fallacy.

Galaxies have order, but no intelligence seems to be required in order for them to form. Put enough stuff into a given area of space, and they will form.

Now, if you want to argue that the laws of physics themselves require an intelligence in order to operate, then I'd like to see your proposed mechanism for an immaterial being to affect material existence.