I was lost but now Im found

[StealthySkeptic]

I'm wondering what is meant by "created man" in this context. There were, after all, cities before this. Cultures. There might have been written records preceding this (not sure, will check). So what does the idea of man being created 4000BC mean?

Natachan,

adam and eve were the first human life on this planet. God has put the time of their creation around 4000BC. There was no cities and no human cultures in existence before this time.

The first city in existence was created by Cain(Adam and Eves son)( Gen 4:17) And the name of that city was called Enoch. This was the first city.

Never mind that there would not be enough genetic diversity for the human race to emerge from only two people. Never mind that outside the Bible, which has no supporting evidence for its claim, there is no proof that there ever was a man named Cain. Never mind even that you then suppose that a global flood is supposed to have happened in your worldview that science does not support.

But no human cultures until 4000 BC?! Did you even take sixth grade history classes? What about the Egyptians, Chinese, Indus River Valley Civilization, Sumerians, Jericho, Hittites, Persians, Native Americans, etc?



This is what happens when you allow bullshit in your history textbooks. *Facepalm*