(January 11, 2015 at 6:57 am)fr0d0 Wrote:(January 11, 2015 at 6:51 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: Are you implying there is bad science in the god delusion?
Do tell.
Not at all. I'm stating quite clearly that there is terrible, infantile theology going on in there. Dawkins is the Ray Comfort of the theological world.
Ray Comfort uses bad science to support his stupid beliefs so what I am seeing is still an implication that the science in the god delusion is flawed.
The theological points made in the god delusion may be simplistic but are they wrong?
If so why?
I couldn't see any errors in his logic and theology is the most useless of all ologies it is a study in nothing, a minor branch of anthropology at best.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.