(August 2, 2010 at 12:24 am)Skeptisma Wrote: I still find it fucking mind-boggling that she didn't have the balls to make sure that shit never saw the light of dvd.She was drunk, she'd already said "no". I don't think she expected it to be on a DVD, since by her own testimony she wasn't there for the filming; she knew nothing about it.
As for not having the balls...once she found out her rights had been violated, she sued the filmmakers. Erm...that's a pretty ballsy move.
Oh, and for everyone saying "why didn't she sue the woman". Yeah, think for a moment; she's drunk, everyone around her is drunk; the woman isn't on camera. At the time she didn't think it would cause any harm, and years later she realizes it did. Good luck finding that woman again.
