(August 3, 2010 at 8:49 pm)Dotard Wrote: I thought I said this, but reading back I see I didn't. So late as it maybe, I'm gonna say it now.
(August 1, 2010 at 5:12 am)Synackaon Wrote: Now reasonably, it is obvious by your actions in public, that the goodwill or implied intention by your very actions imply that you wish the attention of all, including a camera crew.
I maintain the same holds true for the mini-skirted escalator rider. You calling it an 'exteme example' does not make it any less truthful.
Then you have no sense of perspective or gradients. Your actions indicate significant planning or realization of the potential outcomes (if you didn't, then people might have sympathy and try to stop you); the mini-skirt wearer, however, does not have the societal nor social expectations (we call it reasonable expectations) that indicate anything other than being seen as a normal member of the public.
You as an atheist enjoy a reasonable expectation of not getting special treatment - I'd hate to think how different your life may have been if all atheists were subjected to harassment (oh wait, many were until modern times...).
You enjoy being not harassed yet you deny that for others, despite common and legal reasonable expectations - cognitive dissonance worthy of certain... individuals who believe in certain ridiculous things.
