(January 31, 2015 at 2:24 am)bennyboy Wrote:(January 31, 2015 at 2:03 am)Surgenator Wrote: You're using physical monism for the description and only assert that it is describable in idealistic terms. Your assertation isn't justified.I don't understand this. Do you think that in an idealism, paint doesn't exist, or it doesn't dry? If so, then you are arguing past me, not with me. I've seen paint, and observed that it dries. What does this have to do with a physical monism?
Neither. You're claiming physical terms and explanations can be translated into idealist terms and explanations. This claim is not justified. On the QM level, you only have wavefunctions not redness, dryness or any other qualia.
