(February 2, 2015 at 12:54 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:I don't think so. As with cosmogony, the reason the fundamental building blocks are brought together in a framework is pretty much a mystery to me. I suppose if you wanted to, you could identify the Big Bang singularity with the logos: in the beginning was the word, and the word was with God and the word was God / God is the alpha and the omega, etc. I'm not making this argument, though.(February 2, 2015 at 12:50 am)bennyboy Wrote: Why is it that I can't access information on your computer, but we can both share information on the internet? It's context-- each of us is part of a whole, and some of that whole is available to us, and some is not.Are you suggesting, like Berkeley, an overarching Supreme Intellect that supports the fullness of phenomenal reality?
To me, this seems like a category error, kind of like: parts of the universe think, therefore the universe is thinking.
