(February 13, 2015 at 5:06 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: ...
(February 13, 2015 at 3:05 pm)Pyrrho Wrote: It does not matter whether god created diseases and cancer in the beginning or only later on. Either way, it is god's creation, if he created everything. So he cannot escape responsibility by creating it later on; it is still his handiwork.Sure it does, and for the previously mentioned reason.
Right, because Adam and Eve sinned, little babies, who had nothing whatever to do with that, get bone cancer. You seem to imagine that if someone does something wrong, then it is right to punish people for it who had nothing to do with that wrong. If someone else commits murder, would it be just to lock you up in prison or execute you for it, if you had nothing to do with the murder? Is that your idea of justice?
(February 13, 2015 at 5:06 pm)orangebox21 Wrote:(February 13, 2015 at 3:05 pm)Pyrrho Wrote: If the disease were not caused by an intelligent being, then it would just be amoral.
According to your worldview it is.
That is hilarious, coming from you, given that you previously posted:
(February 13, 2015 at 1:45 pm)orangebox21 Wrote: ...
Secondly you'll have to prove that diseases and cancer are evil to make your argument. Are not chemical reactions amoral?
...
"A wise man ... proportions his belief to the evidence."
— David Hume, An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Section X, Part I.
