We really have to agree on what "morality" means. There seem to be two popular variants, which have nothing to do with each other:
1) An assessment of the effect of actions upon the wellbeing of individuals and society, weighing up positive and negative
2) What god finds acceptable and unacceptable
This new "objective morality" definition doesn't fit into either of those categories, as god is not free to decide what it acceptable and what is not. Instead we have:
3) An arbitrary set of rules
Again, this has nothing to do with definition (1).
To me, the only morality that matters is definition (1). If you wish to argue why we should ignore this definition, and not care about the help/harm assessment of actions, I'd be interested to hear why.
1) An assessment of the effect of actions upon the wellbeing of individuals and society, weighing up positive and negative
2) What god finds acceptable and unacceptable
This new "objective morality" definition doesn't fit into either of those categories, as god is not free to decide what it acceptable and what is not. Instead we have:
3) An arbitrary set of rules
Again, this has nothing to do with definition (1).
To me, the only morality that matters is definition (1). If you wish to argue why we should ignore this definition, and not care about the help/harm assessment of actions, I'd be interested to hear why.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum