(March 2, 2015 at 11:37 am)Esquilax Wrote:(March 2, 2015 at 11:15 am)watchamadoodle Wrote: So does Huggy believe in the Biblical Flood and Noah's Ark? I wasn't following this thread, but I see we are discussing those possibilities.
If I recall, the last time someone asked him that question directly he got all evasive and didn't answer, which leads me to believe that the answer is yes, but that he at least has the good sense to know how ridiculous and untenable that makes his position.
Really? In case I haven't made myself clear (which I have) I believe the WHOLE Bible, that clear enough? Anytime anyone has asked me a yes or no question I have always gave a yes or no answer, show where that hasn't been the case. Ont the other hand I Just asked you guys to answer a yes or no question, and not one of you has answered, so who's dodging?
To refresh your memory
Quote:are you saying that it is impossible for a planetary body to shift in its orbit? A yes or no answer will suffice.
(March 1, 2015 at 8:31 am)Cato Wrote: In addition, I suppose it's theoretically possible to shift the moon's orbit; however, the event would be highly unlikely. Despite already showing that this is impossible as an explanation for the Biblical deluge, you tacitly suggest that a second equally unlikely event must have taken place to restore the moon to its original orbit. You see, your proposal rapidly becomes silliness.
In case you haven't heard, the universe, according to "science" was created from a huge series of "highly unlikely" events.
As far as my proposal being "silliness", I going to list three scenarios, Pick the one that is least silly according to what you know to be possible/impossible.
1. The universe created itself.
2. The universe was created by an intelligent being.
3. The universe has always existed.