(April 7, 2015 at 2:40 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Right, but none of that is what I'd call 'scientific'. Interesting thought experiments with some good ideas and some bad ideas with vaguely supernatural stuff sprinkled in? Sure. Just because it deals in extremely vague and ill-defined ideas doesn't make it any more striking or resonant to me.
Okay maybe not scientific but he arrived at it by a process of logical enquiry. Personally I'd call that scientific but if not that then philosophical. But all only coming from what he observed in himself, so introspective and not based on anything supernatural.