RE: 2016 Elections
April 17, 2015 at 12:11 am
(This post was last modified: April 17, 2015 at 12:14 am by Anomalocaris.)
(April 16, 2015 at 11:38 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote:(April 16, 2015 at 10:16 am)Chuck Wrote: I doubt anyone inheriting half of his genes even from Hillary could be as dumb as that moron.
At least he's not a war criminal or married to one. Hillary was secretary of state while we committed war crimes abroad that she supported. Her husband's embargo in Iraq killed somewhere around half a million people in what can only be considered a war crime. Hillary is the worst candidate on either side of the ballot. I hope the democrats find someone else or that they make good on their rhetoric and actually nominate an anti-war candidate, which of course they won't because it's a party of war criminals.
Practically speaking, in a criminal world, a big country like the U.S. would be worse off being led by a big time moron than by a small time war criminal. On the scale of war crimes Hillary, or even bill, are small time croaks indeed with only misdemeanors. Bush is a big time, life without parol felony, war criminal every bit on par with, if not more criminal than, saddam Hussein. Most of the republicans field would like to be seen eager to equal or surpass bush, with the exception of Paul, who is a rank moron.
I tAke petty misdemeanor Hillary any day.