2016 Elections

[CapnAwesome]

At least he's not a war criminal or married to one. Hillary was secretary of state while we committed war crimes abroad that she supported. Her husband's embargo in Iraq killed somewhere around half a million people in what can only be considered a war crime. Hillary is the worst candidate on either side of the ballot. I hope the democrats find someone else or that they make good on their rhetoric and actually nominate an anti-war candidate, which of course they won't because it's a party of war criminals.

Practically speaking, in a criminal world, a big country like the U.S. would be worse off being led by a big time moron than by a small time war criminal.   On the scale of war crimes Hillary, or even bill, are small time croaks indeed with only misdemeanors.   Bush is a big time, life without parol felony, war criminal every bit on par with, if not more criminal than, saddam Hussein.  Most of the republicans field would like to be seen eager to equal or surpass bush, with the exception of Paul, who is a rank moron.

I tAke petty misdemeanor Hillary any day.

I disagree with her being small time. Or at least her husband anyway. While I agree that Bush was awful, almost as many people died in Iraq because of US embargos during Bill Clinton's presidency as during Bush's presidency. It's a small difference. For me it's an absolute though. I will never vote for a war criminal. Hillary is one. Jeb is certain be one. Maybe he'll be slightly worse than Hillary, but a war criminal is a war criminal. I doubt Rand Paul would be one. Almost equal is my doubt that he'll get anywhere close to the Republican nomination.