(April 17, 2015 at 12:27 am)Chuck Wrote: I make the major distinction between embargoes that kills not necessarily for a justifiable purpose, and launching a major aggressive war against international norm, and in the process makes an orderly international system with non-violent means of conflict resolution much less credible, and war in general as well as violent attempts to disrupte beneficial status quo and stability much more likely.
The farmer is a callousness, the latter the essence of war crime.
If the dead could talk, they would tell you death by embargo or death by war is still dead.
You're just rationalizing voting for the slimeball that conforms to your ideology.
