RE: Dawkins explains why he wont debate William Lane Craig
June 20, 2015 at 10:12 pm
(This post was last modified: June 20, 2015 at 10:37 pm by nihilistcat.)
Craig is a freak who I think wears lip gloss or some shit, and for some reason he reminds me of pee wee Herman (my apologies to pee wee).
I remember when Dawkins said this on prior occasions, I think his reasoning was ... he'll only debate a bishop or higher (or words to that effect). In other words, Craig is too lowly for Dawkins to bother with (although his aversion to Craig based on his literal interpretation of even the most disturbing parts of the buy-bull is a new one, but definitely a great reason to not debate that slithering piece of cockroach feces).
I remember when Dawkins said this on prior occasions, I think his reasoning was ... he'll only debate a bishop or higher (or words to that effect). In other words, Craig is too lowly for Dawkins to bother with (although his aversion to Craig based on his literal interpretation of even the most disturbing parts of the buy-bull is a new one, but definitely a great reason to not debate that slithering piece of cockroach feces).
