Dawkins explains why he wont debate William Lane Craig

[Won2blv]

In TGD pages 157,158 he uses fallacious reasoning that we attribute a designer to what we think is a design. But that would raise the question, who designed the designer. That is not a refutation of a designer at all. And then he points to evolution as a more field tested scientific theory. But it certainly doesn't prove that there is no god. And then he say that there isn't a similar theory for physics but there will be. And in conclusion, there certainly is not a god. I am not even saying that he is wrong and WLC is right, he is just clearly responsible for skewed arguments that are tinted in a way that makes people feel stupid if they do believe in god.