RE: Islam is the real deal
July 12, 2015 at 4:12 am
(This post was last modified: July 12, 2015 at 4:34 am by huss88ein.)
(July 12, 2015 at 2:26 am)Minimalist Wrote:Ok thats so weird that you dont even trust your own translation but it is just as acceptable for me cause so I will tell you one thing any one can write anything on the internet and claims it is professional but if you want something authentic you should read in a book for a professional I recommend that you read quran and modern science for Dr Zakir Naik he is professional for god sake he is even a Doctor in these things.(July 11, 2015 at 11:08 pm)huss88ein Wrote: Well my friend if you have a problem with my translation then dont trust me take the word علقة and copy it to google translate and you will find your answer inchallah
I've got my answer. There are professionals who translate this stuff and they disagree with you. Guess who comes out on top?
So read it and see for yourself. It is easy to aquire there is even an app on Android good luck
(July 12, 2015 at 2:33 am)robvalue Wrote: Even if the book contains knowledge which would be surprising for people at that time, it tells us absolutely nothing about how they got their information. They don't get to just say "God told me" and expect us to believe them. That is a claim in itself that needs verifying.Ok my friend you raised two amazing questions
Also, I don't care if Allah exists, he's not worthy of my attention.
First if this book contains some scintific miracles why should be god the one who told mohammad , well the answer is simple all of the knowledge in quran was impossible to be known at the time but lets argue here and say that mohammad was a great scientist and had studied this kind of things so where are his mistakes in quran as any other scientist he must make mistakes .
So let us also forget that and say that he was lucky let us just calculate how lucky he was we all know the probability theory such as tossing a coin , so if we take the verse about people not being formed whole in whom but in many phases that would be a fifty fifty chance. And for the creation of everything from water as it known that the cytoplasm is 80% water and it is in everything so that would be 1 in thousand chance assuming they knew 1000 materials at the time and for the shape of earth being egg shaped would be like 1 in 8 assuming they knew 8 geometrical shapes and the examples are numerous to mention all in here but let us do this math only it will be 1 in 16000 thats some tough odds my friend
(July 12, 2015 at 2:33 am)robvalue Wrote: Even if the book contains knowledge which would be surprising for people at that time, it tells us absolutely nothing about how they got their information. They don't get to just say "God told me" and expect us to believe them. That is a claim in itself that needs verifying.And for the second part of your question that allah is not worthy of being worshipped may I ask why to know your point of view just to give u an adequate answer . thank you
Also, I don't care if Allah exists, he's not worthy of my attention.
