What happened to the war on ISIS?

[WinterHold]

No one has ever had the experience of serving 30,000 years in prison. That list of life sentences is for murder and child rape. Cutting off the hand is for theft , correct?

No. The U.K punishes robbery by life imprisonment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robbery

http://londoncriminalsolicitors.co.uk/theft/robbery/

The west's laws against robbery and theft are far more sever than simply cutting the hand of the robber. Throwing somebody for life (as in England) or for 25 years (as in New York) between mad inmates to rot alive, is far more worse than cutting a hand and let them go/

Also, if things were a little bit darker (like in America, 100 years ago), revolvers would be the sentence; all the time.

Jörmungandr 


No. The whole world was messed up -even long before that-; actually, history is not by your side. Let me proceed:

1-The biggest military invasion in history took place in Normandi; where 1 Million western soldiers from the U.S, Britain and France, invaded the Nazi-controlled beach:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Invasion_of_Normandy

2-Comfort Women, were females estimated in thousands, used as sex slaves. The enslavers (to the reader's surprise) weren't Middle Eastern Muslims, but were actually, Japanese imperial soldiers:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comfort_women

3-A European non-Muslim king, was famous for creating FORESTS OF IMPALED PEOPLE:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vlad_the_Impaler

4-The Mongols weren't from the Middle East; they -the Mongols- rained havoc and death across the world, even to China and Eastern Europe:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_inv..._conquests

5-Middle Eastern people didn't make the atomic bomb

Don't misunderstand me. Everywhere is messed up, depending on the time. Once upon a time, having access to Iraq was like getting a Visa to the States or Canada. While living in Europe meant to be taken and get thrown in a battle that has lots of knights waving their axes and long swords.

Or maybe get impaled by vlad or the Ottomans? 

The days turn. That's a sign from God btw.

Thumpalumpacus[/url]

I always say: real nationalism would never, ever, go with religionn.
One has to choose between allegiance to "the kingdom of God" or the "Local Constitution".

That's why ancient Christians had the Church.

[url=http://atheistforums.org/user-2808.html]Pandæmonium 

No. This is the schoolboy non-sense:





I, on the other hand, prefer to use real languages to discuss real issues. I also dislike meth. 

I was born, raised on Middle Eastern soil. Not Just Middle Eastern, but ARAB soil.
So I know the history of this region like the back of my hand. 

No, there was no "Middle East" in the way it looks like now before Sykes-Picot. That's the real history that you should check;Panda.
How did the phrase came to be, how the region was cut like a cake by the hands of the British and the French, 100 years ago.

But Islam dominates such history; that's why I posted the topic in a religious section.

Middle Eastern governments -All of them- are more "Kafir" than you and than non-Muslim. "Mao" and "Lenin" were probably more Muslim than these guys.
They are so non-Muslim, to a degree that makes Richard the lionheart cries in shame.

Visit their prisons to discover that. 

Do you know, that the first thing they torture "islamists" with, is pissing on the Muslim holy books? also, they tear beards -like; pulling them until they come off", and lots of other insults.

What the U.S did in Iraq, was actually practiced everyday by Arab regimes.
Human rights in the west is far more better than the wet hole that the west made in the Ottoman backyard.

I agree with the last line you wrote..literally with every word.

Stimbo 

It's a very nice thing to see Wahhabism backfires at their faces.


Rhythm


When your people forget what "hard work" means, then expect your family to grow as fat as fuck, and die waiting for the next bucket of fries.
That's why China is winning, obviously.

And hey...You yourself are not willing to answer the one question that would end this debate permanently:
"What was the U.S doing in Iraq in 2003"?Please don't say WMDs xD

American economics don't need an expert. Fiat currency, a federal reserve (that is owned by the forbidden word); and hell lots of paper printing that needs war to cover up. From my opinion, it's useless to try to convince you with such fact. A fact that will be shown soon.

BTW, the economic crisis of 2007 was expected an known to come.






So really, Rhythm: what do you know about the "business cycle"? especially that of post-WW2 America?
oh wait wait wait

Conthperith theory..

Cato

lol, every Arab country you see today is a production of Sykes-Picot. Fact.
Do you think there were like...elections??

Chimp3

Such invasion never happens because of a president or a single politician. Even if he played the " look look i'm a clown" card.
Bush the son knew exact;y what he was doing.

He invade iraq based on higher orders; just like after him, obama and clinton bombed Libya.