(October 7, 2017 at 11:17 am)Sonah Wrote: Then explain the perfect dogmatic fence he made. As in future generations having hell is consequence for not screwing up next generations... no other religions has that as in "putting faith in that one religion" zoroastrianism i think introduced heaven and hell, but not authority over it.
No other gods has done that "except Islam" but i don't believe in death penalty for being a whore. So i count values on forgiveness than judgement on earth, so by that default i pick Christianity. But i am not into fundamentalist form of it. I believe in creating better environment and letting people come to Jesus or do mistakes and try to repent from it if they hit bottom, but my main priorities would try to effect better environments of a place.
Though i am a homophobe by definition, not saying as any individual that you are immorale if you like men. But the environment same as porn creates somewhat weird perversion, suddently you like blood, cannibalism and often killers and murderers. So in that definition i think gay environment is dangerous to society of people who are weird and essentially becomes sick by nature. Not good for the mind. Humans have this philosophy better adapted than animals, so being homophobe is quite natural for humans in the same way we won't think its good to eat poop like animals does. We are pretty hefty that way.
well here's the problem with zoroasting-ism... while it is mention in much older text than the bible. there are no orginal text that define what zoroasting is... I mean to say nothing that define zoroasting before Christianity was a thing... matter of fact I think the oldest compilation of zoroasting texts are from the 14th century... (but they are incomplete as well) so we then have to go to 1771 to find the oldest completed version. So even though Zoroasting-ismis mentioned before Christianity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avesta it is quite easy to postulate that what is zorosting-ism isn't what it once was. that it was copied from judaism and Christianity rather than the other way round...
Wow that was a fact you seem to be completely unawareof... But no more right? I mean You did your research and just missed the biggest distance between religion as practice and it's oldest holy text....
oh, noes... you missed out on homophobia as well... in that it is a sin... even though it may not be immoral. Seems like you don't know the difference between what is immoral and what a sin is. And because you are not able to seperate sin and morality you immorally judge Christianity. Good thing being ignorant (or not checking facts) is not a sin.
