More proof 45 wants blind loyalty.

[Angrboda]

I actually have quite a bit of criticism for The Donald. One which actually has bearing here is the fact that he tweets about everything. Picking fights with people after the fact and calling people names is not in anyones best interests in politics and he does himself no favors by doing it again, and again, and again.. It is undignified, given his position. However, I want to be as detailed as I need to be for the benefit of the more ignorant cunts among you. Whether Donald Trump calls someone "stupid" doesn't have a single thing the FUCK to do with his right to fire them.

I think, contrary to your view here, Trump's tweets are an integral part of his politics and are aimed, intentionally or not, at accomplishing specific personal and political objectives. Rather than, as you see it, an excess on Trump's part, I see it as something important to him and his objectives. The message is a part of the reason it's troublesome, and perhaps a bit more strategic and tactical intelligence could be applied, but his tweeting has served, at minimum, a very useful propaganda function for him, despite any of the negatives you might cite. It's the exposure on things such as calling people stupid that is the problem, not a question of whether his doing so serves a useful purpose or not. It clearly does. And that's one of the sad observations about the current president.