(June 2, 2014 at 8:39 am)alpha male Wrote:(June 2, 2014 at 8:22 am)Losty Wrote: What are you talking about?I'm talking about the fact that I addressed humans v. animals separately from DNA, and prefaced the part about DNA with "Within humans." Therefore, it's pointless for you to note that we don't need DNA to separate animals from humans. You should go back and read the whole thread.
I love how AM will just shit out an argument, and then a few pages later will refer to it as a point "he already proved" when the last few pages were devoted to debunking his flawed argument.