(June 2, 2014 at 2:10 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Ah, so you're pro-choice then.Pragmatism is lost on you. By your definition, a person in the U.S. would need to break the law in order to be pro-life.
You do realize that's pro-choice, right?
Pro-choice isn't pro-abortion. Pro-choice can include what you claim is now your position, that you don't approve of abortion but you'll let a woman decide for herself.
Quote:Which contradicts your earlier posts that you would seek to ban all abortion, including in cases of rape, but would "allow" exceptions for rape as a means to an end of getting a total ban later. But hey, apparently you've evolved.And hypotheticals apparently confuse you too.