Since I'm tired of this run around, I'll just note that you can't justify why you are justified in forcing what you admit are just your personal opinions on others to make decisions for them. You have done nothing in this debate but utilize Red Herring and Tu Quoque evasion tactics as well as employed dishonest semantics to further obfuscate rather than clarify. You have ignored my lengthy posts on self-awareness and why this is a factor in determining moral obligations and keep repeating the "life begins at conception" mantra, pretending this is somehow an equivalent argument.
And as if all this weren't bad enough, you confused Star Trek and Star Wars.
So I'm content at this point to agree to disagree, confident that you have been fully exposed as a sanctimonious, busy-body, dishonest, bullying dickhead.
And as if all this weren't bad enough, you confused Star Trek and Star Wars.
So I'm content at this point to agree to disagree, confident that you have been fully exposed as a sanctimonious, busy-body, dishonest, bullying dickhead.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist