(June 4, 2014 at 2:08 pm)alpha male Wrote: There's no burden of proof regarding opinions. If you say chocolate's best but I say black raspberry is better, I don't need to prove it - it's just an opinion.
But when you seek to force your opinion on others, whether by legislation or by personal action, the burden of proof *IS* on you to show there is good cause to do so.
I know I only said that about a dozen times on this thread so here it is again.
You have not done this.
You have admitted that you can't do this.
Ergo: You lose.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist