(June 4, 2014 at 2:28 pm)alpha male Wrote:(June 4, 2014 at 2:24 pm)Losty Wrote: For the same purpose as having an abortion. She doesn't want the fetus in her body.There's a wee bit of a difference in that, in the first case, there's no baby at the end. In the second, there is.
So, again, for what purpose? She wants to keep the baby, but just doesn't want to be pregnant anymore?
I don't know if you noticed, but in most places abortion after viability is illegal. The argument is that once the fetus is viable it has more right to live. Okay that is fine, but just because the fetus is viable and has a right to live does not mean it has the right to live in her body.
This is just me talking though. It's really not relevant. If we made abortion affordable and easy access we wouldn't need to discuss late term abortions outside of medically necesarry cases.