(June 5, 2014 at 9:15 am)alpha male Wrote: Yes, I've said all along that you can't prove opinion, and we're both gulity of it.Not me. By the 3rd trimester, the fetus meets all possible criteria, so there is objective justification to restrict 3rd term abortions.
But we do agree that you are guilty of this. Apparently, you're just fine with that.
I can only wonder how you might feel if a female dominated society began passing laws requiring you to have a vasectomy at the age of 40, especially when their only justification for such an intrusive law into your life is "it's just our opinion that men shouldn't father children after the age of 40".
Quote:Ah, so now you further hurt your position with ad hoc shifting of criteria, and try to spin that as justification.When did I shift at all? I've been repeating myself constantly for the last 20 pages.
Quote:A woman wanting an abortion after 21 weeks might say the same of you.24 weeks is the self-awareness/viability consensus, which I'm fine with. Again, there's objective justification for the assertion of the existence of "Person A" after this point.
Sorry, both sides don't.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist