(June 10, 2014 at 8:18 am)alpha male Wrote: Not when the logic stems from premises which are bare assertions and appeals to self-evidence:I don't think my case did. Still waiting for you to present any logical arguments behind your arbitrary human DNA standard.
Quote:Again, IMO it's immoral to to accept "more-or-less" and "pretty much" as standards regarding the question of terminating a human life.Human life hasn't been proven to exist prior to 3rd trimester.
Quote:That is the expedient position. The moral position is to go with the earliest point at which your standard might be met until we know better.Actually, it's immoral to impose on the life and liberty of another unless you know you have cause.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist