(June 10, 2014 at 11:52 am)alpha male Wrote: I quoted the opening premises from the post you link to. One is a bare assertion and the other is an appeal to self-evidence.Well, at least your finally addressing my arguments instead of summarily dismissing them as just my opinion. Go on. More detail please.
Quote:You argued yourself that it exists by your own definition as early as 21 weeks, which is second trimester.Are you seriously having trouble grasping the difference between "possibly" and "proven"?
Quote:Yet you would do so. You can't say when life begins with certainty, yet you'd prohibit abortion at 21 weeks at times, or 24-28 weeks at other times.See the last 20 pages of our exchange.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
