RE: What happened to the war on ISIS?
September 22, 2016 at 5:15 pm
(This post was last modified: September 22, 2016 at 5:27 pm by ReptilianPeon.)
There's so much money driving the Cult of Najd - nation states even - in particular Qatar and Saudi. It's easier said than done. People are fighting this B.S. but the enemies of the reasonable people in the Arab world are constantly reloaded by the Americans in particular.
Saudi would collapse without all of those American and British made weapons. It needs strongmen in charge to keep it together. The Saudis use harsh tactics to keep the country together.
The United States could stop selling weapons to terrorists like al-Saud. But then Hilary and Obama know where they can make a quick buck for their buddies in the defense industry. The Obama administration has sold more weapons to Saudi than any other presidency. America's economy is based on exploiting people and war in general.
The Clintons didn't have to accept those paid speeches from the GCC strongmen they prop up. They chose to go to those countries and accept the money. Hilary has control over who she accepts money from. Hilary is not left-wing, a liberal or a feminist. She's terrible for women in the developing world.
She has about as much regard for Saudi women as the Saudi authorities do. She only pretends to care women and "feminism" because she has to if she wants to become president. Granted, she's better on women's issues that Donald Trump, but she's got a lot catching to do when compared to Jill Stein. If she really cared about women's issues then she'd be a lot harder on OIC countries, many of whom are close American allies, and in particular the GCC countries.
Not to mention, she plays the "woman card" frequently (or gets her lackeys to do it) and thus minimizes cases of real sexism. She only wants to be president because she feels that she's entitled to be next in line for the Oval Office. Nothing more than that.
Saudi would collapse without all of those American and British made weapons. It needs strongmen in charge to keep it together. The Saudis use harsh tactics to keep the country together.
The United States could stop selling weapons to terrorists like al-Saud. But then Hilary and Obama know where they can make a quick buck for their buddies in the defense industry. The Obama administration has sold more weapons to Saudi than any other presidency. America's economy is based on exploiting people and war in general.
The Clintons didn't have to accept those paid speeches from the GCC strongmen they prop up. They chose to go to those countries and accept the money. Hilary has control over who she accepts money from. Hilary is not left-wing, a liberal or a feminist. She's terrible for women in the developing world.
She has about as much regard for Saudi women as the Saudi authorities do. She only pretends to care women and "feminism" because she has to if she wants to become president. Granted, she's better on women's issues that Donald Trump, but she's got a lot catching to do when compared to Jill Stein. If she really cared about women's issues then she'd be a lot harder on OIC countries, many of whom are close American allies, and in particular the GCC countries.
Not to mention, she plays the "woman card" frequently (or gets her lackeys to do it) and thus minimizes cases of real sexism. She only wants to be president because she feels that she's entitled to be next in line for the Oval Office. Nothing more than that.
