I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?

[Asmodee]

Asmodee, you are keen to exchange thoughts with me grounding ourselves on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas?

That is my impression that atheists here do not care to exchange thoughts with me at all, they just want to say something from their own whatever motive, but exchange is to my observation, impossible; for they don't continue after their first or second reaction to my efforts to develop a link with them, as to continue until we get into a concurrence on whatever we are into, in our exchange.

Dear Asmodee, see if this is not also the case at present with my reaction to your post reproduced below.

I fear you will already at this point go away.

It seems to me, that atheists here really resist any serious attempts to get them to interact with me, and then they will accuse me of trying to proselytize them when I exert further to connect with them.

You see, dear atheist readers of this post, I am here just to enjoy my hobby of knowing what atheists are into and what I am into: from my part I am curious, what about you atheists here, are you also curious to know what I am here into?

Okay, you ask me, and I will tell you, namely, that I am curious to know what you are into here in this forum and in this thread started by me.

And yes, I know God exists, and I am very curious to know how atheists come to know or whatever it is with them about denying God existing.

At this point theists here will say that they don't understand my English.

So, there, I again fail from my own fault to get linked up with an atheist here, just to satisfy my curiosity: what is driving them to post messages but to not pursue an interaction as to come to concurrence on whatever the issue is, that is taken up with them.

Now, I also notice that they will try to drive me to get annoyed terribly, and then I wind up getting banned forever,  owing to being unkind with my language.

Anyway, I have not read all the new messages this morning, I just get started from the last new post here and move to my last post prior to the present session, so I will go now to see whether Jesster, the lady poster here, she with the adage, your friendly neighborhood heathen, whether she has taken up with my invitation for us to pursue whatever it is with her to take up with me, aside from saying that I am trying to digress from whatever it was I was digressing from.

Summing up: I will just most cordially invite any atheist here at all, to let us we two, for I cannot be answering every post that is addressed to me, I am only one person, not a battalion, but there are atheists here who many of them take to react to me and then disappear, forever(?).

If you want to chat, I'm okay with that.  The way you talk is a little "foreign" to me and it is, at times, difficult for me to determine what you are saying.  That is NOT a dig about your English being "poor".  Far from it, your English is quite excellent, but the way you string words together is different than I am used to.  So yes, I do find it a little difficult to understand your point pretty much all the time.  I still don't know what you want here.

So why don't we keep it simple?  Tell me to which god you are referring?  Where is this god defined?  Is it just a definition you came up with yourself?

For the record, I do not "deny God exists".  To state that someone "denies the existence" of something is an aggressive statement which asserts that the thing is real and this person is irrationally denying it.  For instance, when we talk about "climate change deniers" or "holocaust deniers" we are not talking about people whose opinions we respect with a different view.  We are talking about irrational people who are denying that which we know to be true.  So when you say that we "deny the existence of God" you are making an aggressive statement, asserting that your opinion is absolutely correct and that we are irrational for disagreeing.  Perhaps that is not your intention, but that is how that statement is used.

That being said, there are no gods that I know of.  Is it possible there are gods I do not know?  Everything we have ever observed in the universe has followed the laws of the universe.  A god, by its nature, would be beyond these observable laws of the universe.  If it were not it wouldn't be a god by any definition I have ever heard.  Given that we have never seen a single thing which did not obey the physical laws of the universe, there has never been a single observation to suggest it is possible that some god exists.  So is it possible?  Sure.  I don't know everything about the universe.  Is the chance good enough to consider that possibility?  Not even close.  No data to suggest something is true means that thing is not worth considering as any consideration would be mere wild speculation.

What you think you "know" about your particular deity is really nothing more than what you just made up and decided is true.  That is why there are no logical arguments with any merit, because there are only "logical arguments".  If there is no real evidence to suggest I should consider something then there is no reason to consider it.