Or could it be that the original rule was flawed and overly restrictive. Has anyone read the original rule? It extends further than just "mentally ill".
Not sure if this is a good reference or not: http://www.snopes.com/social-security-re...ning-guns/
Repealing it was still a mistake. It should have been re-written with more specific details of what qualifies for reporting.
And this gun guy is still in favor of stricter gun control.
Not sure if this is a good reference or not: http://www.snopes.com/social-security-re...ning-guns/
Repealing it was still a mistake. It should have been re-written with more specific details of what qualifies for reporting.
And this gun guy is still in favor of stricter gun control.
I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem.
