RE: What in 2012?
January 4, 2012 at 9:47 pm
(This post was last modified: January 4, 2012 at 9:57 pm by reverendjeremiah.)
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 1, 2026, 8:29 am
Thread Rating:
|
What in 2012?
|
|
Oh yeah. We do the same thing every time we want war. Embargo. See basically what some embargos and sanctions do is actually stop the supply of life needed supplies to the PEOPLE of the countries. Not to their governments, so we are suppressing innocent people with this shit, and in turn their government must react. Exactly what happened with Japan, anyone think they attacked Pearl Harbor cause they were bored? lol. I also find it funny that we have sandwiched Iran by occupying Afghanistan and Iraq. We have tried to take Iran down before, by propping up Saddam to fight the Iranians in the Iraq-Iran war. So this is all old news, coming back into light, same with Gaddafi, someone decided to put the machine in overdrive. I do wonder why? Why now? Aramco wants Iran's wells, it's pretty simple, same with Libyas. And when Geroge Bush makes out with a Saudi King, you know they are in it together. But don't talk about Saudi human right issues...
The vast majority of terrorists were Saudi's
Im not big into conspiracy theories...but damn...sometimes I just cant help but think this last decade has been carefully planned.
The definition of a conspiracy is an, evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
I think you can remove the word theory... lol. I mean look at that picture you posted! RE: What in 2012?
January 5, 2012 at 7:55 pm
(This post was last modified: January 5, 2012 at 7:55 pm by Minimalist.)
Quote:sometimes I just cant help but think this last decade has been carefully planned. You see "careful planning" here? ![]()
Of course you can't have perfect planning when you have a large portion of a population against your occupation. Imagine if China occupied New York or something, you could call me a insurgent, terrorist or whatever, I would be attacking those invaders for sure. So when you take/occupy something with force you will have opposition and of course it will be a cluster-fuck, if the Iraqi people really wanted to be "free" they wouldn't have fought back for years. Any time you try to do something against a person or peoples will, you will have an opposition and it will be a cluster of fuck.
I do see planning in the new middle east stuff. "Helped" Libya... not Bahrain, we have Naval ships in Bahrain(cause they let us), Saudi sent in troops to help their government get the protestors. Bahrain was a real uprising, and was shot down in no time. RE: What in 2012?
January 6, 2012 at 1:38 pm
(This post was last modified: January 6, 2012 at 1:41 pm by reverendjeremiah.)
On October 20, 2010, the U.S. State Department notified Congress of its intention to make the biggest arms sale in American history - an estimated $60.5 billion purchase by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Yeah nothing planned here... lol It's middle east domination time!
On the plus side, it reduces our trade deficit. Arms are about the only thing the US makes anymore.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too." ... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept "(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question" ... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist RE: What in 2012?
January 6, 2012 at 4:16 pm
(This post was last modified: January 6, 2012 at 4:18 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(January 6, 2012 at 4:10 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: On the plus side, it reduces our trade deficit. Arms are about the only thing the US makes anymore. No, we also export the sort of financial services that hides free-spending nation's debts until they threaten to drag down the largest economic block on earth. Whether Obama has any second chance at presidency in 2012 probably depends much more on the designs of Frau Merkel than on the machinations of Mr. Romney. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



![[Image: 74_1740739.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i4.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fy108%2Frschilla%2F74_1740739.jpg)