Islam true religion?

[reverendjeremiah]

The flys (atheists) on this site are more attracted to honey than bullshit.

Real flies are more attracted to feces.

Phil - You got your peanutbutter on my feces!

Me - You got your feces in my peanutbutter!

Introducing Phil&Rev's "Reeses' Fece's"

[The Grand Nudger]

But please explain that why would a trustworthy and honest man like Muhammad (Peace be upon him) lie about an angel being send down to him? It wasn't for money as he rejected money in his prophethood.

Face it, if Quran is accepted by Scientists then surely that means only one reason is behind it. That is a divine being my friend.

Here is another article for you. http://www.bookofsigns.org/2011/09/meani...-in-quran/

I would like to hear your opinion.

A trustworthy what? Trustworthy character in a legend, roger. Trouble is, the Quran is not "accepted by scientists", it is "accepted by apologists". Lets work on "reasons behind things" real quick. If i asked you to explain any given situation by reference to one completely un-demonstrated concept..or three very well demonstrated concepts..which do you think would be the "simpler" explanation. How could we put this thing to the blade?

Would you like to personally explain some part of this claim that you feel is airtight, something well evidenced that could, at least in theory, be disproven? Since you want to put on the lab coat and assume science as your strategy let's do this all "sciencey". Make a negative prediction. Name something we should not find (if this claim were true). Make a positive predication, something that we absolutely must find (if this claim were true). I'll put as much effort into this as you, and if all I get is hyperlinks all you'll get in return are hyperlinks.

My opinion is that you've hyperlinked apologetics, and?

[reverendjeremiah]

In other words Zakir, if we should be swayed by your current approach to apologetics, then why not also be swayed by L. Ron hubbards appologetics to Dianetics?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenu

[The Grand Nudger]

Now there was a trustworthy man, who performed miracles, and gave his entire life to helping others with no thought of himself or the consequences.

[reverendjeremiah]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5KsEtCxiLU

[Zakir_250]

http://islamic-replies.ucoz.com/2/Quran_...Light.html = Science supports Quran.

[The Grand Nudger]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joanie_Loves_Chachi = Science supports Happy Days.

[Epimethean]

Zakir is the squidlink man!

[Aegrus]

How do you know he didn't watch them. So condescending to assume that someone hasnt seen your so called evidence and dismissed because we "dont understand it or havnt seen it". Kindly go away if you dont care what we have to say because we dont buy the mythology youre selling.

This is exactly why I struggle to take you seriously.

Yes, Zakir, I saw all of your "evidence". Now, would you kindly answer my questions instead of evading them for a third time?

[Faith No More]

Basically I once spoke to an Agnostic and he said the best way to argue with a atheist to by showing the evidence for your religion and then he will consider God exists as the evidence is too much. I just used that way of argumentation but clearly people were being rude.

The flaw in this thinking is that we are athiests because we have seen the evidence, and we will never be overwhelmed by such evidence. The mocking (mostly) came from your inability to articulate your own argument, forcing you to copy and paste someone else's ideas. If yoiu want to debate(Spoiler: None of us will ever turn to Islam no matter what you say) you need to put out your own point that is based on facts and then post the llinks for those facts. The links should only be used to back up your argument, not to go to a page where someone else practically lays out your argument for you.

The only chance in the world you have of converting atheists to Islam is to find someone who is only an atheist because the don't put much thought into it. You won't, however, find any of those here.